I notice that there is a power base, from the RA in the conflict, who has power invested in her by the school, and the other party in the conflict is simply a student. The underlying issue is complex, and based in basic human needs, values, and miscommunication. While I realized the complexity of the conflict, the fact that one of the major causes of the conflict is based in basic human needs reveals just how deep the conflict goes. It also makes the conflict much more deep rooted, and that could open up possibilities for more aggression. The conflict is taking place both in an interpersonal and intragroup arena, and there is a lot of overlap between the two. This means that the interpersonal dynamics within the group can greatly influence the conflict as a whole. There is also an issue of stereotyping and mirror-imaging, as part of the communication issue. The two opponents in the conflict are trying to show each other their differing points of view, but they are projecting their own world view on the conflict which makes it more difficult to resolve. Each sees the other as a mirror-opposite of them and has trouble realizing the things they have in common. The conflict is then much more rigid. Looking at conflict through the process of conflict analysis reveals makes the conflict seem much more structured. Conflict analysis allows you to approach a conflict from a non-emotionally invested point of view, and to see things differently that you would if you were only thinking of your own interests or point of view. Conflict analysis allows you to be impartial, which makes for more effective mediation and conflict resolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment